바이오인

 

 

Abstract
1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
  1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
  1.2 Objectives of the evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
  1.3 Evaluation process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
  1.4 The report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 Evolution of Finnish participation in the EU Framework Programmes / Features of Finnish

   participation in the Sixth Framework Programme.  . . . . . . . . . . 3
  2.1 Finnish participation in EU Framework Programmes . . . . . . . . . . . 3
  2.2 Finnish participation in the EU Sixth Framework Programme . . . . . 5
  2.3 Networks under Priority area 1 (life sciences, genomics and biotechnology for health) . 5
3 Goals, successfulness and outcomes of the projects . . . . . . . . . . . 11
  3.1 Assessment of the significance of various goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
  3.2 Most significant results and outcomes of the projects . . . . . . . . . 14
  3.3 Challenges and strengths in the networking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
  3.4 Additionality and added value of the Framework Programmes and projects .. . . . . . . . 19
4 Assessment of the communication and diffusion of knowledge . . . 23
5 Framework Programmes in the multi-level governance of science and technology.  . . . . 25
6 Thematic analyses: energy and environment, forest, and ICT . . . . . 29
  6.1 Introduction to thematic analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
  6.2 Energy and environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
  6.3 The forest-based field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
  6.4 IST projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
  6.5 ICT applications in health care products and services . . . . . . . . . 68
  6.6 Case: ARTEMIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
7 Conclusions and policy recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
   Tekes’ Programme Reports in English . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92