바이오인

 

 

Tiivistelmä . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Abstract. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Preface.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
List of original publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Summary article
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2 Original studies: research questions, data and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Research questions and content of the articles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Articles focusing on policies at the national level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Articles combining the analysis of national policies and
urban-regional strategies in the Helsinki region . . . . . . . 18
Data and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . 19
Main sets of data and data collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Th e research process and analysis of data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3 The emergence of competition states and entrepreneurial regions –the theses . . . . . . 32
From Keynesian welfare states to Schumpeterian competition states 35
Schumpeterian competition states. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Variations in competition state strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Refl ections on Jessop’s thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Rescaled competition state regimes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Globalisation of cities and the rise of counter-tendencies to
urban locational policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Refl ections on Brenner’s thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Combining the theses and specifying the research question. . . . . . . . . 49
4 Profi ling the Finnish competition state . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Market-oriented adjustment and the emergence of the information
society as an economic strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Th e ‘Finnish model’ and increasing inequalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

5 Building a neocorporatist and neostatist strategy for technological upgrading . . . . . . . 59
Breakthrough of the ‘innovation paradigm’ and universities’ growing pressure to commercialise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Th e role of the Science and Technology Policy Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Th e challenge of a broad conception of innovation policy. . . . . . . . . . . 67
6 Moving towards urban locational policies – commonalities and divergences. . . . . . . . 71
Th e ambivalent position of the capital region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Th e Centre of Expertise Programme – a showpiece of the Finnish approach to regional development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
7 Regional response to the knowledge-based economy: urban competitiveness policy and university-industry links in the Helsinki region .. . 77
Th e emergence of an urban competitiveness policy in the Helsinki region. .78
Th e central role of technopoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Further rescaling as a part of urban competitiveness policy . . . 81
Universities’ regional economic role and the problem of commercialisation.. .  . . . . . . 84
Th e contradictions of commercialisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
8 Conclusion . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Original publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . 107