정책동향
유럽정책 - Getting More Women to the Top in Research
- 등록일2008-11-17
- 조회수4604
- 분류정책동향 > 기타 > 기타
MAPPING THE MAZE : GETTING MORE WOMEN TO THE
TOP IN RESEARCH
Contents
Foreword ................................................................. 1
WIRDEM working group ........................... 2
Executive Summary ........................................ 3
Introduction .......................................................... 5
Chapter 1. Research Decision-Making: a different perspective ....................... 8
1. 1. Who decides the research funding? ... 9
1. 2. Are there equality regulations governing the research system? ............. 10
1. 3. How fair are the nomination or appointment procedures? ..................... 10
1. 4. Are both research and power male? The image of science,
scientists and decision-making ............... 12
1. 5. Does language restrict research to males? ............................................... 15
Chapter 2. Facts and Figures: a gendered world and why it needs to change .... 16
2. 1. The situation today ............................................ 16
Problem 1: women are less likely to be promoted to top positions .............. 18
Problem 2: low proportion of women on research decision-making boards ............ 20
Problem 3: women researchers paid less than men on the same level (gender pay-gap) .......... 21
Problem 4: the more money spent on R&D the fewer women? ........... 22
Problem 5: “There is no problem”-a lack of awareness and commitment ................... 22
2. 2. Arguments for change ..................................... 23
Human rights arguments ................................. 23
Utilitarian arguments concerning quality ..................................... 24
Utilitarian arguments concerning effi ciency ............................... 24
Common good argument ............................... 25
WIRDEM working group ........................... 2
Executive Summary ........................................ 3
Introduction .......................................................... 5
Chapter 1. Research Decision-Making: a different perspective ....................... 8
1. 1. Who decides the research funding? ... 9
1. 2. Are there equality regulations governing the research system? ............. 10
1. 3. How fair are the nomination or appointment procedures? ..................... 10
1. 4. Are both research and power male? The image of science,
scientists and decision-making ............... 12
1. 5. Does language restrict research to males? ............................................... 15
Chapter 2. Facts and Figures: a gendered world and why it needs to change .... 16
2. 1. The situation today ............................................ 16
Problem 1: women are less likely to be promoted to top positions .............. 18
Problem 2: low proportion of women on research decision-making boards ............ 20
Problem 3: women researchers paid less than men on the same level (gender pay-gap) .......... 21
Problem 4: the more money spent on R&D the fewer women? ........... 22
Problem 5: “There is no problem”-a lack of awareness and commitment ................... 22
2. 2. Arguments for change ..................................... 23
Human rights arguments ................................. 23
Utilitarian arguments concerning quality ..................................... 24
Utilitarian arguments concerning effi ciency ............................... 24
Common good argument ............................... 25
Chapter 3. Potential for Change: good practice and measures ........................ 27
3. 1. Follow the money: Measures to promote gender equality in decision-making for funding
research ..................................................... 27
Gender balance on decision-making bodies ................................ 27
Special programmes for women in funding ..................................... 28
3. 2. Getting women to the top: Measures to promote gender equality in decision-making
for appointments .......................................... 29
Transparent procedures ................................... 29
Targets and quotas ............................................... 30
Hiring incentives .................................................... 31
Mentoring and empowerment ................... 31
Work-life balance ................................................... 32
3. 3. Good research practices to benefit women – and men: Measures to promote gender equality as part of quality management .................................. 33
3. 4. Changing policy: Measures to promote gender equality in setting policy ............. 34
Chapter 4. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................ 38
End Notes................................................................ 41
ANNEX ......................................................................................... 42
Belgium .......................................................................... 42
Estonia ............................................................................. 44
Finland ............................................................................ 46
France .............................................................................. 47
Germany ........................................................................ 49
Greece ............................................................................. 52
Norway ........................................................................... 54
Portugal .......................................................................... 56
Romania ......................................................................... 58
Slovakia .......................................................................... 59
Slovenia .......................................................................... 61
Spain ................................................................................. 63
Sweden ........................................................................... 65
Switzerland .................................................................. 67
United Kingdom ..................................................... 69
3. 1. Follow the money: Measures to promote gender equality in decision-making for funding
research ..................................................... 27
Gender balance on decision-making bodies ................................ 27
Special programmes for women in funding ..................................... 28
3. 2. Getting women to the top: Measures to promote gender equality in decision-making
for appointments .......................................... 29
Transparent procedures ................................... 29
Targets and quotas ............................................... 30
Hiring incentives .................................................... 31
Mentoring and empowerment ................... 31
Work-life balance ................................................... 32
3. 3. Good research practices to benefit women – and men: Measures to promote gender equality as part of quality management .................................. 33
3. 4. Changing policy: Measures to promote gender equality in setting policy ............. 34
Chapter 4. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................ 38
End Notes................................................................ 41
ANNEX ......................................................................................... 42
Belgium .......................................................................... 42
Estonia ............................................................................. 44
Finland ............................................................................ 46
France .............................................................................. 47
Germany ........................................................................ 49
Greece ............................................................................. 52
Norway ........................................................................... 54
Portugal .......................................................................... 56
Romania ......................................................................... 58
Slovakia .......................................................................... 59
Slovenia .......................................................................... 61
Spain ................................................................................. 63
Sweden ........................................................................... 65
Switzerland .................................................................. 67
United Kingdom ..................................................... 69
▶ 박문수(Ph.D) 자료 제공
과학기술연구개발정책 네이버카페 http://cafe.naver.com/RnD
☞ 자세한 내용은 첨부파일을 참고하시기 바랍니다.
-
이전글
- 캘리포니아와 연방정부의 환경 입법 토픽들
-
다음글
- 유럽의 과학 교육